Thursday, September 2, 2010

Sayeeda Warsi - An Interview

Q&A with Baroness Warsi



In an interview with Arshad Sharif of “Reporter” on DawnNews, Baroness Sayeeda Warsi spoke on numerous topics including the floods, the war in Afghanistan, trust deficit of the Pakistani government and her stance on the veil for Muslim women. Following is an English transcript of an Urdu interview with Baroness Warsi on “Reporter” in August 2010.
Q: You have come to Pakistan at a time when the floods have ravaged the country, and have visited some of the areas. What is the situation onground?
A: I think I could never have been prepared to witness what I saw yesterday. I had come here after the 2005 earthquake and visited Muzzafarabad. In many ways, that was the first disaster that I had seen. But the scenes that I witnessed yesterday, it seemed as if someone had bombed the place or flattened the entire villages and towns using a bulldozer. Some exterior walls were still standing, but once you saw beyond those walls, you could see that entire neighborhoods had been destroyed. And it was very disturbing and very emotional talking to people over there. It was very difficult for me because on the one hand I had gone there to learn, to listen to their stories, to see their situation and to share their grief, but on the other hand the British government has given a commitment of over $50 million and the British public has also given over  £15 million …
Q: Baroness, now that you have witnessed the situation firsthand, will you raise a voice for Pakistan at the international level? It is being said that the international community is not responding according to the scale of this catastrophe.
A: I was here yesterday with Andrew Mitchell, who is the international secretary of state for the Department for International Development (DFID) in the UK, and he has already left for New York this morning to attend the UN conference where he is going to ask the world to do more. Along with this when I go back to the UK, I’ll be asking the public, the diaspora community, the business community to do more. Do we have to do more because you are a frontline state? I don’t think that’s the key reason. We must do more because there is a need, there is a humanitarian need here, and I think that’s the first and foremost thing we must bear in mind. You know I talked to a woman over there and she was standing there telling me that she has lost everything and all that she has are these clothes over her body. And I think our first response is due to humanitarian reasons, after that we look at the reasons for all other responses.
Q: There is talk of a trust deficit that maybe the Pakistan government is not trusted enough and even the British government is giving most of the money through NGOs. In case of United States we are also seeing the same thing, the European Commission has also said yesterday that they’ll give most of their money through NGO’s or through the United Nations. Do you think there is a trust deficit?
Q: I think getting the NGOs involved is not necessarily due to trust deficit. I think the reason for using the NGOs is because they are more flexible, they are on the ground and are already working there. The smaller charities, the different organisations which are currently involved there, they can move very quickly. And if you look at organisations like the Islamic Relief, within hours and days they were there, and they were setting up and [were] able to operate. I think the issue of trust deficit is there, there’s no doubt about that, it’s not as if we can deny that. Even your own politicians are not denying it and I think that’s a good thing that you can only deal with a problem if you acknowledge that there is a problem in the first place.
Is that the reason the world isn’t responding? Maybe, but it could also be that the flood disaster is not an issue where thousands or millions of people have lost their lives in an instant. Thankfully, it’s not one of those disasters where a lot of lives are lost. [That being said] it’s one of those disasters which unfolds. It first started in Khyber Pukhtunkhwa, then came down to Punjab and then Sindh, the disaster is unfolding day-by-day and its consequences are also unfolding day-by-day. So because of that it is much difficult to sell to the world, to say this is a huge disaster and you need to respond, which is why it was necessary that I and Andrew come here and look at things ourselves.
But I think the issue of trust deficit is also being discussed, is also being dealt with. I spoke to Mian Nawaz Sharif, Prime Minister Gilani, General Nadeem, had a meeting with the finance minister, and all of them are pulling in the right direction. One of the things I suggested was that the overseas Pakistanis who are involved in their country’s society and institutions, you should call upon them as well. I was speaking yesterday to the Norwegian ambassador who told me  about a politician of Pakistani origin who is very successful. Such people in the diasporic community [are vital] who know that they don’t just only give money but are also involved in the transparency and delivery process.
Q: Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, you are the most powerful woman in Britain and are also a Muslim woman. In it there are some identity issues which might haunt you especially when people like Anjem Chaudhry of Al-Muhajiroun say that people like you are like coconuts, brown on the outside and white on the inside. How do you deal with the identity crisis? When you come to Pakistan expectations from you are different, while when you are in Britain the expectations are different, at the same time being of Pakistani descent and having a Muslim identity. How do you balance all of this?
A: I think the accolade I got of being the most powerful Muslim woman [in Britain] is very flattering. But my daughter said to me, yes mother you are the most powerful Muslim woman but it is still you who makes daal paratha in the house at sehri time, not anyone else. So I think that there are roles that women still have to adopt and I think that I’m very comfortable with those very different roles. I think the Pakistani origin identity I have, I’m proud of it. Being a Muslim, I’m proud of it. Being born in Britain, being raised there, being a cabinet minister in that society I’m very privileged and I’m proud of it. And I don’t feel that in all those there should be inconsistencies. It is not necessary that if you’re a Muslim you can’t be a British, or if you’re a British you can’t be a Muslim or from a Pakistani origin. I think it’s about how comfortable you are in your identity and how openly and with pride you can say that’s fine this is what I am. And I think saying in front of the Downing Street, I’m proud to be a cabinet Minister and wearing shalwar kameez saying I’m also proud to be a Pakistani and openly saying I’m of the Muslim faith and proud to do that, I don’t think that that’s an identity crisis. Yeah there are idiots in Britain, you’ve named some of them, who have an issue of identity crisis themselves, who think that they are the only ones who can raise the voice of Islam or it is only they who can promote their culture, but in reality those people are a blotch on the name of Islam. They bring to my religion, to my beautiful religion, a bad name and bring a bad name to my culture and they represent all those characteristics which I think are not part of our religion or our culture.
Q: How would you define Britishness? What is Britishness?
A: Britishness is a feeling of tolerance, it is a feeling of allowing people to live their lives the way they wish to live their lives. It’s about fairness, it’s about meritocracy, it’s about a dream where somebody like me a laborer’s daughter can be born in that country whose parents went there with 200 rupees in their pockets and they set up multi million businesses there. It’s people like me whose families have no political history, no political background.
Q: Equal opportunity, merit, tolerance, you mentioned all these things. But in Europe and also Britain there is currently a move going on about burqa, that it should be banned and the all-encompassing face niqab should also be banned. What are your views on this? Do you think this should take place? Do you feel it is restrictive, and all the things you mentioned about Britishness, do you think this merges with those things or not?
A: My statements about burqa have been very very clear right from the outset that no country has the right to tell a woman what she should wear and what she should not wear. This is a woman’s choice that what dress she adopts for herself. If she wants to wear shalwar kameez or she wants to wear trouser suit or she wants to wear a burqa this is her individual choice and that’s Britishness, about allowing people to choose what they want to wear. I think, and I also said this before, that it is not the right of some middle-aged British man to stand up and tell a Muslim woman, or any woman, that your skirt is too short, your kameez is too tight, your dupatta is too long or your niqab is too dark. That is none of their business, that is a choice for women to make and it is an instinctively British right that women have these rights to make these choices and it is an instinctively Islamic choice that women make choices in their life.
Q: America has announced a time frame for the war in Afghanistan. Would there be talk on the withdrawal of British troops also? What is the thinking of the Conservative Party in this regard as you are also the Chairperson of the Conservative Party.
A: I think our Prime Minister has said very clearly that there has to be an exit strategy with regards to Afghanistan. He has already given some indication time lines like 2015. And I think there is an acceptance that Britain and other foreign powers are not there to stay permanently in Afghanistan and I’m very delighted that there’s a very clear indication that slowly the military operation there would cease.
Q: And can there be talks with the Taliban also as part of an exit strategy?
A: I think we’ve always said that there are some sections of Taliban with whom discussions can be held.
Q: Do you think that if Tony Blair had not supported America in Iraq and Afghanistan, than the situation which we face today, the threat that Britain, Europe and Pakistan are facing, things would have been different.
A: I don’t know whether I can predict that, but what I can say for sure is that, that war was wrong. I was against the war in Iraq. I, like millions of other people, demonstrated in the streets that we should not go to this war. By profession I’m a lawyer and I had real concerns regarding the legality of the basis of this war according to international law. I was against the war then, and I still feel that we shouldn’t have gone to Iraq at that time.
Q: Do you think with the coming of Conservative Party with people like you part of it, the image of Britain as a lackey of the Americans in the war on terror would change in the Muslim countries? Do you think with these policies of Conservative Party, as you mentioned that you were against the war and being the Chairperson that’s a very strong message, the image of Britain among Muslim countries and especially Pakistan would improve?
A: I think that … I can only comment on my government and my coalition government and our approach to international relations. I can say this for sure that the role that I have is that if there’s a misunderstanding between Pakistan and Britain then that misunderstanding should be removed and the understanding should be improved, and the many years of friendship we have should be made more entrenched.
Q: How can that friendship be made more entrenched when David Cameron goes to India and gives a statement that Pakistan is pursuing a double policy on the war on terror?
A: I think if you’re good friends with a country, then I think and even you would know that, that good friends sometimes tell each other things which they don’t like. But the real test of friendship is that when you are undergoing the most difficult times, who stands shoulder to shoulder with you. And I think when sadly recently Pakistan faced this difficult time of floods, Britain was the first one to respond. We were the first ones to give a response and also the ones to give the biggest response. Not only have we responded ourselves but have also asked the world to stand by Pakistan. And I think if someone has any doubt in his mind about the friendship between Pakistan and Britain, he should look at our response and have confidence that this friendship is strong, it is much stronger than any individual statement.
ON 08 26TH, 2010
Arshad Sharif is the Islamabad Bureau Chief of DawnNews. He tweets at http://twitter.com/dawntvreporter and can be found on Facebook.

Islamophobia in Europe

BY TALHA ZAHEER 

A few months ago, I came across a (now infamous) YouTube video about changing demographics of the Muslim population in Europe. The tone was ominous as it warned of the dawning of an Islamicised Europe. In 39 years, the video claimed, France will be an Islamic republic. In 15 years, half the population of the Netherlands will be Muslim. In 2050, Germany, too, will be a Muslim state.
Although I was a bit skeptical about the authenticity of the statistics presented, I basically bought into the video’s premise – that a higher birth rate among Muslim immigrants would cause a marked shift in Europe’s demographics, making it predominantly Muslim. I’ll even admit a part of me swelled with pride at the prospect.
Even though I was aware that a Christian group had produced the video, I do not recall being offended by that initial viewing. But then the rebuttals and clarifications began. A new YouTube video put out by BBC’s Radio 4 titled ‘Muslim Demographics: The Truth’ exposed the alarmist agenda of the first clip by pointing out its liberal use of inaccurate data. And when the BBC news service evaluated the inauthenticity of the statistics, my eyes were fully opened to the strong Islamophobic message of the original video.
The growing problem of Islamophobia in the West is being increasingly documented. The trend is more pronounced in Europe than across the Atlantic, where it is thought that Muslims assimilate more readily. The demographics video may have been an amateur venture, it has coincided with the release of several bestselling books that implore Europeans to wake up and do something to save their culture and their continent. Interestingly, these pseudo-academic attempts have mostly emanated from American authors, apparently discontent with their own incursions into Muslim territories in Iraq and Afghanistan.
One such attempt by Christopher Caldwell titled Reflections on the Revolution in Europe: Immigration, Islam, and the West has received considerable attention in both the American and British media. It is startling to see how reviews of the book from across the pond could be so divergent. While The New York Times claims it is a balanced, thoughtful effort, the Guardian lambasts its unambiguous racial bias.
The contrast between North American and European perceptions of Islam has several explanations. The Europeans are a lot more sensitive and fidgety about the subject, with sentiments in Britain being especially volatile.  The British National Party (BNP), for example, advocates for a return to the good old pre-1948 whites-only days and only falls short of calling whites a superior race. The party actively promotes alarmist views about the spread of Islam in Europe and calls for the deportation of Muslim subjects to their homelands, regardless of whether those subjects – many of whom have been born in Europe – had ever set foot outside the continent.
Parties like the BNP have started gaining impetus throughout Europe with their lightly veiled hatred towards the ‘other’ seeping into passive locals and manifesting itself towards Muslims, effectively making Muslims the Jews of this century. Antediluvian theories advocating social homogeneity have resurfaced as insecure Europeans are manipulated into thinking they must cling on to the last remnants of their dying culture through propagandist videos and literature that wouldn’t be out of place in Nazi Germany.
BNP-type, far-right groups are openly asking to repeal laws that make equal opportunity mandatory, effectively promoting discrimination. Even more alarming is their popularity. In recent elections, the BNP won three seats for the first time.  With such open hostility towards Muslims, albeit in small segments of the population, what measures are European governments taking to allay fears within the Muslim community? The concept of second-rate citizens, after all, runs counter to fundamental western values of equality.
And while the debate within white-Europe rages, what of Muslim European sentiments? What of those who are being forced to decide between a religious and national identity in secular countries such as France? Nikolas Sarkozy, who claims to be a ‘demanding friend of Muslims,’ has proven to have littley sympathy with the concept of pardah. His latest battle is against body- and head-covering swimming attire for women – God forbid a woman should go for a swim in anything other than a bikini.
These strange reactions to Muslims in Europe make me reminisce about my days in primary school in Wales. Once a girl named Catherine called me a ‘Brownie’ in a conversation to a third person that I wasn’t even privy to. Within minutes, I had my whole class rally around me, giving me their support and completely shunning the girl for being racist. At the time, I myself never realised what the big deal was. But my 12-year-old friends were incensed. And if that’s how youngsters from a remote area where a non-white was an anomaly used to react a decade ago, how has the European landscape come to face such a regressive crisis?
On my recent visit to Manchester, I saw mosques with windows smashed in. Previous riots in Bradford, now popularly called ‘Bradistan’ for its large proportion of desis, may not have merely been racial in nature and may also have been fueled by Islamophobia. If Europe does not address these issues quickly and sensitively, this may well be the beginning of a slippery slope. With persecution, discrimination and racism to deal with, just how long will Muslims remain tolerant? How long before they start to flee? And who’s really to blame if they opt for the radical alternative?
Going over the evidence in search of a holistic perspective, I still fail to see how three per cent of the populace could threaten a whole people by their mere existence in the same geographical space. Let’s not forget, it’s not like Muslims forced their entry into mainland Europe. They came as legal immigrants because Europe needed their labor. Through citizenship, they have earned the right to better treatment.
Toronto-based Talha Zaheer blogs about diaspora-related issues for Dawn.com.
He is also the Toronto FC correspondent for Goal.com.
ON 08 18TH, 2009

Pakistan - Diplomatic Corruption

Official given £6,000 to join golf club

By Khawar Ghumman 
Wednesday, 01 Sep, 2010

ISLAMABAD: The Public Accounts Committee of the National Assembly was informed on Tuesday that a bureaucrat posted at the country’s consulate general in Manchester had used official funds to secure the membership of a local golf club in 2007. 

The membership cost the public exchequer 6,000 pounds. 

Mr Hamid (his full name was not mentioned at the meeting) not only managed to win the post of commercial secretary, but also got approval for his club membership from then commerce minister Humayun Akhtar Khan whom he had earlier served as staff officer. 

Documentary evidence placed before the PAC by the audit department revealed that the club membership fee had been paid out of the Export Market Development Fund (EMDF) primarily meant to finance projects and activities aimed at promotion of exports. 

Commerce Secretary Zafar Mahmood opposed recovery of the amount from the official, although he conceded that using government funds to secure membership of a golf club was unprecedented. “He is a good officer and I don’t think he would be able to pay this amount,” he said. 

The secretary’s statement appeared to be in contradiction of the stance he had taken at a departmental accounts committee meeting in May when he said the amount should be recovered. 

Mr Hamid is about to complete his three-year term in Manchester. 

MNA Yasmin Rehman, who was presiding over the meeting in the absence of PAC chairman Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan, asked the secretary to make the recovery as soon as possible. 

Khwaja Asif of the PML-N said: “The money should be recovered from the minister who endorsed the expenditure.” 

Members of the committee unanimously called for recovering the amount. 

During scrutiny of the accounts of the commerce ministry of 2008-9, audit officials also discussed wasteful expenditures of around Rs50 million by the finance ministry in 2007-8 on conducting several studies for promoting exports. They said the studies had been conducted in a highly suspicious manner; open bidding had not been held for selecting consultant firms and the then commerce secretary had made payments in contravention of his financial powers. 

Mr Zafar Mahmood said the expenditures had been approved by the then commerce secretary, Tanvir Ali Agha, who is currently the Auditor General of Pakistan. 

The PAC said the ministry should hold another meeting of the departmental accounts committee to determine whether the objectives of the studies had been achieved. 

Another case of waste discussed at the meeting was an unauthorised expenditure of Rs2.406 million on mobile phones calls. The chief executive of the Trade Development Authority of Pakistan exceeded his approved ceiling. Most of the calls took place during foreign visits by the official. The committee ordered recovery of the amount. 

When contacted, Mr Humayun Khan confirmed Mr Hamid’s foreign posting during his stint as commerce minister. “Yes, I also approved payment of 6,000 pounds for his golf club membership fee and that was absolutely within my purview,” Mr Khan said in reply to a question. 

The worst of times

BY SAIMA SHAKIL HUSSAIN ON 08 30TH, 2010


To paraphrase Charles Dickens’ opening line in A Tale of Two Cities quite heavily, this is the absolute worst of times –  full stop. There is no qualifying ‘best of times,’ no ‘age of wisdom,’ no ‘epoch of belief,’ ‘season of Light or ‘spring of hope.’ In fact, this is the ultimate pits of times. There is no other way to say it. It’s quite simply a very, very bad time all around.
Apart from causing millions to become internally displaced, the flood water has exposed the gaping trust deficit that exists both within the country and outside of it. International donors are hesitant, not sure if the funds and goods that they do contribute will end up with those who deserve them. It is difficult to blame them when Pakistanis themselves, rather than depending on the federal or provincial governments to do anything, seem to have devised a sort of ad-hoc adopt-a-village programme whereby private citizens and student groups are gathering goods and delivering them to the victims themselves. Or least to the ones they are able to reach.
And while all this is going on in the homeland, in a far away land, New York City to be precise, the ‘Ground Zero Mosque’ controversy is in full swing. The fact that the proposed project is not a mosque but rather a cultural centre, and is to be built on private property a few blocks away from that hallowed ground is being ignored. Indeed, the term ‘Islam Free Zone’ is being used in association with lower Manhattan.
Choosing to downplay the facts that an estimated 60 Muslims also died in the attacks and that there had existed a Muslim prayer hall inside the fallen World Trade Centre, rabid right-wingers have whipped up anti-Muslim sentiment to the extent that even President Obama felt pressured to temper the supporting comments he had made at the annual White House iftaar a day earlier.
The demonisation of Islam has reached such a feverish pitch that American Muslim leaders have become markedly anxious that this year Eid ul-Fitr will fall around September 11. They are concerned that those Americans who are ignorant about Islam – sadly they number very many – will choose to interpret it as a celebration of the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. Finding the right balance between showing respect for the victims and not giving into fear is the very tough task ahead for America’s Muslim communities.
While contemplating these turbulent times, I could not help but think of the trials faced by the first Muslim community in Madinah. I was especially reminded of the following passage from Martin Lings’ monumental workMuhammad: His Life Based on the Earliest Sources (1983) which gives a detailed account of the incredible odds that faced the small and impoverished band of believers who struggled to build a new life while also defending themselves against their many enemies:
“Before the Prophet (peace be upon him) set out [for the Battle of Khaybar], one of the men of Awas known as Abu Abs came to him with a problem. He had a camel to ride, but his clothes were in rags and he had no means for procuring any provisions to take on the march and nothing to leave for the upkeep of his family, let alone buying himself a new garment. There were many others in similar circumstances, though this was an extreme case. But much had been spent on the Pilgrimage, and everything that had been gained so far in the way of spoil was outweighed by the increasing number of poverty-stricken converts who came to Madinah from every direction.
The Prophet gave Abu Abs a fine long cloak, all that was available for the moment; but on the march, a day or two later, he noticed that he had on a much poorer cloak and he asked him: ‘Where is the cloak I gave thee?’ ‘I sold it for eight dirhams said Abu Abs. ‘Then I bought two dirhams worth of dates as provision for myself, ad I left two dirhams from my family to live on, and bought a cloak for four dirhams.’ The Prophet laughed and said: ‘O father of Abs, thou and thy companions are poor indeed. But by Him in whose hand is my soul, if ye keep safe and live yet a little while, ye shall have abundance of provisions and leave abundantly for your families. Ye shall abound in dirhams and in slaves; and it will not be good for you!’”
Dr Martin Lings (1909-2005), or Abu Bakr Siraj Uddin as he was also known, earned acclaim throughout the Muslim world for his book which was proclaimed to be the ‘best biography of the prophet in English’ at the National Seerat Conference in Islamabad.
Combining simplicity with grandeur, he has narrated events from the Prophet’s life that are familiar to many, but what make his telling of them stand apart are the Arabic sources of the eighth and ninth centuries – Ibn Ishaq, Ibn Sa’ad and Al-Waqidi – whom he has quoted extensively.
Thus from the men and women who heard the Prophet speak and witnessed for themselves the events of his life the reader learns of the monumental challenges he and his followers faced time and again. In a society that was staunchly tribal and allegiance to lineage was deeply entrenched, they emigrated from their ancestral homeland – something had never been imagined before – and laid the foundations of an egalitarian society in a peaceful oasis.
That our society today is neither peaceful nor egalitarian while a sizable number ‘abound in dirhams’ bears witness to the prophecy which was made so long ago.


Saima Shakil Hussain is the editor of Dawn’s ‘Books & Authors’ magazine.