Thursday, July 22, 2010

The Nation - July 21

US overlordship


SECRETARY Clinton’s visit to Islamabad might have rendered the prospects of executing development projects in certain essential fields more attainable, but the political mileage that, in the process, the Pakistan government has ceded to the Americans more than offsets the gains that might accrue from these projects, some time in the unspecified future. While the benefits are subject to the stipulation that the development process does really take off and is taken to its logical conclusion - and does not wither away amid petty technicalities like the much-hyped ‘reconstruction opportunity zones’ announced in March 2006 - the vital concessions that we have given to the US in deciding about our policies are quite tangible at the present. It is time that we remembered the golden principle of falling back on our own resources to meet our needs; for if the price of aid to help us stand on our own feet and be counted among the advanced nations of the world is sovereignty, we had better summarily dispense with such an aid. 

Let us also not forget that Hillary Clinton set the tone of her visit by declaring that should there be another incident similar to the one of New York's Times Square, the consequences for Pakistan would be very severe. To quote her words uttered in a BBC interview, “it would have a very devastating impact on our relationship.” The threat does not deliberately take into account the predicament of the key ally in the war on terror that the menace, largely created or at least accentuated by the US policies in the region, is not entirely under Islamabad’s control. It can, therefore, be interpreted as plain and simple pressure to bring Pakistan into line with Americans’ wishes in pursuit of their strategic goals. 

No comments:

Post a Comment