Sunday, September 19, 2010

Yom Kippur at Sea

September 17, 2010


 

By SAM KESTENBAUM
Deer Isle, Me.
TODAY is Yom Kippur, the holiest day in the Jewish calendar. It is the Day of Atonement, a day of meditation, of repentance and redemption. Many Jews will spend it at temple or in a house of study, meditating, reading Torah and chanting contemplative psalms together or quietly to themselves.
Last year, right after graduating from college, I took a job on a commercial lobster boat here in my hometown as a sternman, one half of a two-man crew. A few days before Yom Kippur, I told the captain that I couldn’t work on the holiday.
This is not a typical day for lobstermen to take off, at least not on Deer Isle, and he looked puzzled. I explained, “You see, it’s a High Holy Day.” It was 4:30 in the morning and the sun had yet to rise. We were sipping coffee on the dock as the row of diesel boats beside us sputtered to life.
I wasn’t sure how much he knew about our holiday, or how much I should tell him.
Should I explain that we fast on this day, humbling ourselves before God and preparing for judgment? Should I tell him how fates are sealed in the Book of Life? Or should I instead share some of the biblical stories that we retell on Yom Kippur? Launch into the tale of the binding of Isaac, or talk about Abraham and Sarah? Should I recount Jonah’s trip to the bottom of the sea, and the redemption he finds there in the belly of a whale? Should I commandeer the CB radio on our boat and blow the shofar, the ram’s horn, across the airwaves?
We finished our coffee and made our way to the boat, lunch boxes in hand. I decided it was too early in the morning for shofar blowing. Besides, we had more than 300 traps to haul — a full day’s work.
Growing up on Deer Isle, I quickly learned that there was something a little different about how my family worshiped. There were many churches on the island — from Catholic to Protestant to Latter-day Saints; from small, one-room church houses to big, established churches with freshly paved driveways. We didn’t pray at any of these. Instead we made a weekly pilgrimage to the nearest synagogue, 60 miles away in Bangor.
One day, earlier in the fishing season, my captain and I were stacking lobster traps in his dooryard. Another fisherman sat nearby and watched us. He was in his mid-80s and spoke with a thick Down East accent, the kind that would be unintelligible to anyone from out of state.
“I see you’ve got a man who works hard. Think you’ll keep him around?” he asked my captain. Then he chuckled and turned to me.
“What did you say your name was again?”
“Sam,” I said. “Sam Kestenbaum.” He raised his eyebrows.
On the island, the name Kestenbaum is often met with this kind of puzzled look, then followed by, “You’re going to have to spell that.” Certain last names fill up pages in the phone book here. The names of old families that have been here for generations, networks of cousins, aunts and uncles — Eaton, Haskell, Hardy, Heanssler and Weed, among others. But you will find only one Kestenbaum family in Hancock County. And you won’t find too many other Jewish lobstermen (perhaps not particularly surprising considering the non-kosher status of the catch).
Despite this, I feel close to my faith when I’m on the water. The work is difficult, but meditative. Fishermen grapple daily with the elements: the wind, the tide, the shifting of the seasons. Jews also keep their eyes on the elements, recognizing the great, sacred powers that are present in the world. And wherever we go, we believe God travels with us.


It is said that when the Jews went into exile, the Shekinah, the divine presence, went into exile, too — hovering over us, around us wherever we were, waiting for us to invite the sacred into our lives. This is one of the great gifts of diaspora: we travel, move, but remain who we are.
Last year, during the week of Yom Kippur, a storm whirled into Penobscot Bay, the first of the fall. The rain was heavy; fierce winds shook the trees and bent their branches. It turned out I wasn’t the only fisherman to spend the holiday onshore. Most stayed in their shops, mending traps, coiling rope or painting buoys.
And me, I drove the hour and a half to the Bangor temple to meditate on teshuvah — on turning and returning to God, on starting fresh. It wasn’t boat work, but it was work — a kind of repair, a checking of the knots and wiring, refueling for another year.
And today I’ll do the same. On this Yom Kippur, I wish my fellow Jews “gmar chatima tova,” may you be written in the Book of Life for good. And to my fellow fishermen: I wish safe waters and good hauls. May the price per pound of lobster rise. May we weather the coming storms.
Sam Kestenbaum works on a lobster boat.

ENTREPRENEURS

Just Manic Enough: Seeking Perfect Entrepreneurs



September 18, 2010
 

By DAVID SEGAL
Cambridge, Mass.
IMAGINE you are a venture capitalist. One day a man comes to you and says, “I want to build the game layer on top of the world.”
You don’t know what “the game layer” is, let alone whether it should be built atop the world. But he has a passionate speech about a business plan, conceived when he was a college freshman, that he says will change the planet — making it more entertaining, more engaging, and giving humans a new way to interact with businesses and one another.
If you give him $750,000, he says, you can have a stake in what he believes will be a $1-billion-a-year company.


Interested? Before you answer, consider that the man displays many of the symptoms of a person having what psychologists call a hypomanic episode. According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual — the occupation’s bible of mental disorders — these symptoms include grandiosity, an elevated and expansive mood, racing thoughts and little need for sleep.
“Elevated” hardly describes this guy. To keep the pace of his thoughts and conversation at manageable levels, he runs on a track every morning until he literally collapses. He can work 96 hours in a row. He plans to live in his office, crashing in a sleeping bag. He describes anything that distracts him and his future colleagues, even for minutes, as “evil.”
He is 21 years old.
So, what do you give this guy — a big check or the phone number of a really good shrink? If he is Seth Priebatsch and you are Highland Capital Partners, a venture capital firm in Lexington, Mass., the answer is a big check.
But this thought exercise hints at a truth: a thin line separates the temperament of a promising entrepreneur from a person who could use, as they say in psychiatry, a little help. Academics and hiring consultants say that many successful entrepreneurs have qualities and quirks that, if poured into their psyches in greater ratios, would qualify as full-on mental illness.
Which is not to suggest that entrepreneurs like Seth Priebatsch (pronounced PREE-batch) are crazy. It would be more accurate to describe them as just crazy enough.
“It’s about degrees,” says John D. Gartner, a psychologist and author of “The Hypomanic Edge.” “If you’re manic, you think you’re Jesus. If you’re hypomanic, you think you are God’s gift to technology investing.”
The attributes that make great entrepreneurs, the experts say, are common in certain manias, though in milder forms and harnessed in ways that are hugely productive. Instead of recklessness, the entrepreneur loves risk. Instead of delusions, the entrepreneur imagines a product that sounds so compelling that it inspires people to bet their careers, or a lot of money, on something that doesn’t exist and may never sell.
So venture capitalists spend a lot of time plumbing the psyches of the people in whom they might invest. It’s not so much about separating the loonies from the slightly manic. It’s more about determining which hypomanics are too arrogant and obnoxious — traits common to the type — and which have some humanity and interpersonal skills, always helpful for recruiting talent and raising money.
Some V.C.’s have personality tests to help them weed out the former. Others emphasize their toleration of mild forms of mania, if only because starting a business is, on its face, a little nuts.
“You need to suspend disbelief to start a company, because so many people will tell you that what you’re doing can’t be done, and if it could be done, someone would have done it already,” says Paul Maeder, a general partner at Highland Capital. “There are six billion human beings on this planet, we’ve been around for hundreds of thousands of years, we’re a couple hundred years into the industrial revolution — and nobody has done what you want to do? It’s kind of crazy.”
ON a recent Saturday evening, Seth Priebatsch is sitting in his office/bedroom in the 26,000-square-foot space that houses Scvngr(pronounced “scavenger”), which he founded in early 2009. Dozens of toy race cars fill a bookshelf on one wall; the other is covered with lists and drawings. The sofa where he crashes in his sleeping bag lies between the two.
He will explain the genesis of Scvngr, and offer a sort of guided tour of his mind, while sitting on a stool in his bare feet, wearing jeans and a Princeton T-shirt. A pair of Oakley sunglasses are perched, as they nearly always are, atop his head — part talisman, part personal branding.
He is lean, smiley and partial to the word “awesome,” which he uses as a noun — as in “an extra dose of awesome.” He speaks quickly and with what sounds like a Canadian accent, which seems odd because he was raised in Boston.
He first pitched Scvngr as a freshman at Princeton, to a professor linked to an annual business plan contest open to undergraduates and graduates. “I told him I wanted to build the game layer on top of the world,” Mr. Priebatsch recalls. “And he didn’t say, ‘You’re insane.’ So I said, ‘And I want everyone in the world to help me build it.’”
Scvngr won first prize, which came with $5,000 and emboldened him to apply to a seed financing company, DreamIt Ventures, which gave him $35,000. The victory also caught the eye of a venture capitalist, Peter Bell of Highland Capital, who read about Mr. Priebatsch’s prize while surfing the Web one night. Mr. Bell popped off an e-mail.
“It was Saturday night, pretty late,” Mr. Bell recalls. “I said, ‘If you ever come to Boston, I’d love to meet you.’”
Mr. Priebatsch replied immediately: he’d decided to drop out of Princeton and move to Boston. The university would be around a long time, he reasoned, but the moment to start Scvngr was fleeting and couldn’t wait a few weeks, let alone three years.
So, what is this potentially globe-altering enterprise?
“Scvngr is a game that you play on your phone, and playing Scvngr is incredibly easy,” he begins.
The game allows you to compete and win rewards at stores, gyms, theaters, museums and so on. A Mexican restaurant, for instance, might offer half off your next soda if you fold the tin foil on your burrito into origami, then snap a picture of it.
If this sounds like little more than a gimmicky way to lure in consumers, well, you haven’t listened to Mr. Priebatsch long enough.
“We play games all the time, right?” he says. “School is a game. It’s just a very badly designed game.” American Express cards, with their escalating status, from green, to gold to black — they are a game. So are frequent-flier miles.
“But game dynamics aren’t consciously leveraged in any meaningful way, and Scvngr does that.”
This, apparently, has enormous implications. “If we can bring game dynamics to the world, the world will be more fun, more rewarding, we’ll be more connected to our friends, people will change their behavior to be better. But if this is going to work it has to be something that anyone can play and that everyone can build.”
This, he says, is the key: Scvngr is both a game and a game platform. Anyone can create a Scvngr challenge, free, using four default games or tools the company offers. There are now 20 million Scvngr challenges in the United States, according to the company, most of which are simple tasks, like “stand in this spot and say something.”
In addition, about 1,000 companies and organizations — including the New England Patriots, Zipcar, Sony and Warner Brothers — pay Scvngr to create and manage their challenges.
“The last decade was the decade where the social framework was built,” he says — most successfully by Facebook. “The next decade will be the decade of games.”
Judging this pitch by reading it, as opposed to hearing it in person, is like appraising a song based solely on its lyrics. Mr. Priebatsch describes Scvngr and the future it portends with burbling fluency, as if it were a country he has visited and one that you must see. He is especially good at giving “the game layer” an aura of inevitability.
It is hardly clear, though, that such a layer will catch on or, if it does, whether Scvngr will be the company to build it. The field of location-based tech games is crowded, and include standouts like Foursquare and Gowalla.
The particulars of Scvngr seem nitpickable, too. The game’s points will earn you whatever goodie is offered on the spot, but there is nothing else you can do with them. And some users have found Scvngr’s challenges to be pretty lame. More than a few of the contests seem like barely veiled marketing ploys — like retailers that “challenge” you to come up with three words that describe the store.
Reviews so far have split the crowd. As of last week, a third of the roughly 1,000 people who had weighed in on the latest version of Scvngr in the iPhone’s App Store gave it the highest rating and one-third gave it the lowest.
“Not relevant to having fun,” read one review.
But Mr. Priebatsch’s pitch has worked, at least by the standards of start-ups, most of which die in the blueprint phase. Part of the reason could be pinned on the investing and tech world’s raging case of Next Zuckerberg Syndrome — the urge to find another Mark Zuckerberg before he starts another Facebook.
But nobody inspires N.Z.S. without a promising idea, intelligence and a lot of charisma. Scvngr today has 60 employees, many of them veterans of very successful tech start-ups. As of December of last year, it also had $4 million from Google Ventures.
Any list of the qualities that have netted all this talent and money should include Mr. Priebatsch’s quasirobotic work ethic. He does not socialize. He no longer reads books, nor does he watch TV or movies. He works from 8 a.m. until 10 p.m., seven days a week. He was reluctant to have a photographer visit for this article because he worried that it might distract employees.
Doesn’t he miss going to bars, just hanging out, being 21? Here’s where Mr. Priebatsch starts to sound like a teenage Vulcan.
“I had friends at Princeton; I’m sure it’d be fun to see them,” he says. “But I know that what I’m going after is huge and others are going after it, and if they’re not, they’re making a mistake. But other people will figure it out, and every minute that I’m not working on it is a minute when they’re making progress and I’m not. And that is just not O.K.”
THE hypomanic temperament is, of course, not limited to entrepreneurs. It’s found in politics (Theodore Roosevelt) the military (George S. Patton), Hollywood (the studio head David O. Selznick) and virtually any field where outsize risks yield enormous rewards.
But the business world has contributed more than its share of hypomanics, particularly the abusive, ornery kind. The most colorful of the breed was arguably Henry Ford.
“He epitomizes the unhinged, entrepreneurial spirit,” says Douglas G. Brinkley, a history professor at Rice University and author of “Wheels for the World,” a book about Mr. Ford and his company. “He became monomaniacal in his belief that the internal combustion engine should be fueled by gas, at a time when everything was electric, and nobody thought you could put gas on a hot motor.”
Mr. Ford could be both charmer and ruthless jerk. When he visited rural America to extol the horseless carriage, listeners were often left hoping that he would run for president. With employees, on the other hand, he was an autocrat who never brooked dissent. He clung so stubbornly to his vision — black cars, and only black cars, for the masses — that the company almost went bust when rivals like General Motors started offering more choices.
Nearly all conversations about contemporary hypomanics start with the Apple chief executive, Steven P. Jobs. Like Mr. Ford, he is a pitchman extraordinaire with a vaguely messianic streak, and, like Mr. Ford, he can anticipate what people will want before they even know they want it.
Mr. Jobs is also routinely described as a despot and control freak with a terrifying temper, says Leander Kahney, author of “Inside Steve’s Brain.”
“Even the prospect of a chewing out by Steve Jobs makes people work 90 hours a week,” says Mr. Kahney. He treats employees as tools, Mr. Kahney went on, as a means to an end, with the end defined as a universe of Apple products and services that are tailored precisely to his specifications.
“I would argue that Jobs has used his control freakery to advantage,” Mr. Kahney says. “The hallmark of Apple is the way it controls the entire user experience — the ads, the stores, the iPods. Nothing is left to chance. That comes from Steve Jobs.”
Scholars in organizational studies tend to divide the world into “transformational leaders” (the group that hypomanics are bunched into, of course) and “transactional leaders,” who are essentially even-keeled managers, grown-ups who know how to delegate, listen and set achievable goals.
Both types of leaders need to rally employees to their cause, but entrepreneurs must recruit and galvanize when a company is little more than a whisper of a big idea. Shouting “To the ramparts!” with no ramparts in sight takes a kind of irrational self-confidence, which is perfectly acceptable, though it can also tilt into egomania, which is usually not.
“We have a grid personality scorecard, across 10 or 12 dimensions, attributes that are critical to success,” says Michael A. Greeley, a general partner at Flybridge Capital Partners in Boston.
The goal is to spot the really erratic characters, whom Mr. Greeley calls “rail to rail”:
“One day they get up and their favorite color is pink. The next day, it’s green. I’ve worked with hypomanics, and where I think it can be quite insidious — people like this turn on colleagues quickly. An employee could be an incredible contributor, and then, after one mistake, they are out of the lifeboat.”
BEFORE Highland Capital invested in Scvngr, Peter Bell gave Seth Priebatsch’s life and résumé the vigorous frisking that is standard in the venture capital business.
Mr. Priebatsch was 19 at the time, which meant that he didn’t have a lot of former colleagues or bosses. What he did have, however, was a surprisingly long track record in business.
Scvngr is actually the third company that Mr. Priebatsch has founded. At the age of 12, with money from his parents, he started Giftopedia, a price-comparison shopping Web site. When he was in eighth grade, the company had eight employees — six in India, two in Russia.
Nobody who worked for him ever asked him his age, and he never volunteered it. “I wouldn’t say that I kept my age a secret,” he says. “I just never offered that information. Nobody knows how old you are on the Internet.”
All communications were handled via e-mail and Skype, often while he was typing on a laptop while sitting in class. For a long time, his teachers thought that he was simply taking copious notes, but he was actually sending instructions overseas with a wireless connection.
“One day, I forgot to hit the mute button on my laptop and it started ringing during French class,” he recalls. The Giftopedia server was down that day, and it was a crisis.
“I got up and told my teacher, ‘I’m really sorry, but I have to take this call.’ ”
Giftopedia was profitable, but a little late to the field, Mr. Priebatsch says. Ultimately, he sold the domain name for five figures and, at 17, founded PostcardTech, which created and mailed out promotional mini-CDs on behalf of tourist destinations and universities. For that company, he rented part of a factory in China, which, he said, was time-consuming but surprisingly easy and didn’t even require a trip to Asia.
Mr. Priebatsch handed PostcardTech off to some friends, who did little with it, and the company has since folded. But it left Mr. Priebatsch with a chunk of money — he won’t say how large — that he has since invested in Scvngr.
Dr. Gartner, the author and psychologist, says he believes that hypomanics come by their disposition genetically. But it is hard to tease out what Norman and Suzanne Priebatsch — a biotech entrepreneur and a financial adviser at SmithBarney, respectively — bequeathed through their DNA and what they instilled in Seth and his older sister, Daniella Priebatsch, as they grew up.
Because chez Priebatsch sounds like boot camp for the brain.
“With both my kids, my wife and I pushed them very hard,” says Norman Priebatsch, who is a native of South Africa. “Very invasive, very intrusive, doing things, planning things continuously.”
As a child, when Seth started to read along with his father — high-level math, physics and history books were the staples — the elder Mr. Priebatsch would often turn the books upside down, adding a degree of difficulty to the experience, and presumably some fun.
The upshot is that Seth can now read as quickly upside down as right-side up, something to keep in mind if you ever find yourself sitting across a desk from him.
“People assume that if you’ve got a sheet of paper in front of you that no one else can read it,” he says, “and that is false.”
Vacations, Seth says, made school seem relaxing. He and his sister were expected to research destinations — Istanbul, Shanghai and Rome, for instance — and then plan most of the itinerary down to the hour. On the trips, they would tour all day and night, leaving time for the children to upload photos to a laptop and type up a detailed account of everything they’d seen.
“We were the scribes of those trips; that was a requirement,” says Daniella, who now works on a sales team at Google. “Every detail — what it was like at the museum, people we met. Even the room number of the hotel, in case it was a good room and we ever came back.”
The rigor and intensity of Seth’s upbringing have left him with a peculiar combination of rarefied skills and mundane deficiencies. He is a gifted software engineer but a terrible driver. (“I hit things,” he says.) He’s perfectly at ease negotiating with V.C.’s, but has had just one girlfriend, a relationship that ended abruptly when someone asked how long they’d been dating.
“We answered simultaneously and she said six months and I said two weeks,” he recounts, sounding amused. “Two weeks earlier we’d had this conversation, and I said, ‘And so now we’re dating, correct?’ And she said yes.”
He shrugs.
“I thought I’d been really clear,” he says. “I find business relationships are easier. You have to sign a piece of paper.”
IN late 2008, as part of the investment process, Mr. Priebatsch had to visit Highland Capital’s offices and present his plan to the firm’s partners.
It went well, but there are still skeptics at the firm. Mr. Maeder of Highland still wonders whether Scvngr is the scaffolding of a major business. At the same time, he regards the $750,000 investment as a bet on Mr. Priebatsch as much as a bet on his company.
“Seth has such a fertile mind; you just know that he’ll attract great people to the company,” he says, “and the ideas will continue to flow and morph until he finds something great.”
You also get the sense that Mr. Priebatsch won’t stop, even if Scvngr is a glorious triumph.
“I like winning,” he says. “I’m addicted to the act of winning, the process. When you are in the act of winning, everything is great. Once you’ve won, that’s boring. It’s cool, it’s better than having lost, but it’s boring.”
Great piles of money would not slow him down, either.
“I’m not anti-money,” he says. “I like nice bikes, I like nice computers. I like that money is a representation of success, but the actual entity itself is not interesting for me. There is little that I would want that I don’t have, and the things that I want money can’t buy.”
Like?
He doesn’t pause.
“I want to build the game layer on top of the world.”

AMERICAN MUSLIMS

Message to Muslims: I’m Sorry


September 18, 2010


By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF

Many Americans have suggested that more moderate Muslims should stand up to extremists, speak out for tolerance, and apologize for sins committed by their brethren.
That’s reasonable advice, and as a moderate myself, I’m going to take it. (Throat clearing.) I hereby apologize to Muslims for the wave of bigotry and simple nuttiness that has lately been directed at you. The venom on the airwaves, equating Muslims with terrorists, should embarrass us more than you. Muslims are one of the last minorities in the United States that it is still possible to demean openly, and I apologize for the slurs.
I’m inspired by another journalistic apology. The Portland Press Herald in Maine published an innocuous front-page article and photo a week ago about 3,000 local Muslims praying together to mark the end of Ramadan. Readers were upset, because publication coincided with the ninth anniversary of 9/11, and they deluged the paper with protests.


So the newspaper published a groveling front-page apology for being too respectful of Muslims. “We sincerely apologize,” wrote the editor and publisher, Richard Connor, and he added: “we erred by at least not offering balance to the story and its prominent position on the front page.” As a blog by James Poniewozik of Time paraphrased it: “Sorry for Portraying Muslims as Human.”
I called Mr. Connor, and he seems like a nice guy. Surely his front page isn’t reserved for stories about Bad Muslims, with articles about Good Muslims going inside. Must coverage of law-abiding Muslims be “balanced” by a discussion of Muslim terrorists?
Ah, balance — who can be against that? But should reporting of Pope Benedict’s trip to Britain be “balanced” by a discussion of Catholic terrorists in Ireland? And what about journalism itself?


I interrupt this discussion of peaceful journalism in Maine to provide some “balance.” Journalists can also be terrorists, murderers and rapists. For example, radio journalists in Rwanda promoted genocide.
I apologize to Muslims for another reason. This isn’t about them, but about us. I want to defend Muslims from intolerance, but I also want to defend America against extremists engineering a spasm of religious hatred.
Granted, the reason for the nastiness isn’t hard to understand. Extremist Muslims have led to fear and repugnance toward Islam as a whole. Threats by Muslim crazies just in the last few days forced a Seattle cartoonist, Molly Norris, to go into hiding after she drew a cartoon about Muhammad that went viral.
And then there’s 9/11. When I recently compared today’s prejudice toward Muslims to the historical bigotry toward Catholics, Mormons, Jews and Asian-Americans, many readers protested that it was a false parallel. As one, Carla, put it on my blog: “Catholics and Jews did not come here and kill thousands of people.”
That’s true, but Japanese did attack Pearl Harbor and in the end killed far more Americans than Al Qaeda ever did. Consumed by our fears, we lumped together anyone of Japanese ancestry and rounded them up in internment camps. The threat was real, but so were the hysteria and the overreaction.
Radicals tend to empower radicals, creating a gulf of mutual misunderstanding and anger. Many Americans believe that Osama bin Laden is representative of Muslims, and many Afghans believe that the Rev. Terry Jones (who talked about burning Korans) is representative of Christians.
Many Americans honestly believe that Muslims are prone to violence, but humans are too complicated and diverse to lump into groups that we form invidious conclusions about. We’ve mostly learned that about blacks, Jews and other groups that suffered historic discrimination, but it’s still O.K. to make sweeping statements about “Muslims” as an undifferentiated mass.
In my travels, I’ve seen some of the worst of Islam: theocratic mullahs oppressing people in Iran; girls kept out of school in Afghanistan in the name of religion; girls subjected to genital mutilation in Africa in the name of Islam; warlords in Yemen and Sudan who wield AK-47s and claim to be doing God’s bidding.
But I’ve also seen the exact opposite: Muslim aid workers in Afghanistan who risk their lives to educate girls; a Pakistani imam who shelters rape victims; Muslim leaders who campaign against female genital mutilation and note that it is not really an Islamic practice; Pakistani Muslims who stand up for oppressed Christians and Hindus; and above all, the innumerable Muslim aid workers in Congo, Darfur, Bangladesh and so many other parts of the world who are inspired by the Koran to risk their lives to help others. Those Muslims have helped keep me alive, and they set a standard of compassion, peacefulness and altruism that we should all emulate.
I’m sickened when I hear such gentle souls lumped in with Qaeda terrorists, and when I hear the faith they hold sacred excoriated and mocked. To them and to others smeared, I apologize.

Sunday, September 12, 2010

Bryans win Championship - Qureshi - Bhopanna win the hearts

Bob and Mike Bryan added another championship plus trophy to their fantastic career.  They are number one and played their best.


Yet, the show was stolen by Aisam-ul-Haq Qureshi and Rohan Bhopanna by giving Bryan Twins the toughest time of their career.




Losing to world's Number One pair is just a part of the game.  But, playing double finals of doubles is an achievement for Qureshi (DDQ - Double Doubles Qureshi).  He won the hearts of millions of Pakistanis back at home where unprecedented floods have displaced millions and deprived them of everything including hundreds of lives.  Qureshi has become a household name in Pakistan in a couple of days.  He has given people hope and rejoice after the agonizing pains, shame and sorrow of Cricket Spot Fixing Scandal.


The Indo-Pak Express, as they are known in the international media, are also acting as ambassadors of peace.  Their pair in the tennis courts is an alarming and formidable force to be taken notice of and their friendship off the grounds is examplry.


Bryans will have to watch them in the future encounters because they have been beaten by Aisam-ul-Haq and Bhopanna in Washington last month.  One of the twins admitted that this was their career's best match.


People of the sub-continent look forward to more victories by the duo and they definitely realize the gravity of the onus that they are carrying on their shoulders from now on. 


Saalik Siddikki

Bopanna and Qureshi

 Double on a peace mission

The sport can cross borders: In Paris, enter the double Aisam Qureshi, the Pakistani Muslim and Hindu, the Indian Rohan Bopanna in common.

If Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal walk in these days by the players lounge of Roland Garros, always walk a few dozen pairs of eyes with them. The superstars of the tennis industry will be in Paris pursued at every turn - sometimes with discrete, sometimes with no hidden eyes of competitors, coaches, representatives of the sponsors, the tournament manager.

Federer and Nadal are the central star in a universe in which literally everything revolves around them. They are even in a tournament like Roland Garros, where it should go to athletic equality and fraternity in the competition courted as the king. You get the best seats, the best training times, the best match fixtures, even if they do not ask.

Rohan Bopanna and Qureshi Aisam be hardly noticed in the huge caravan of nomads professional establishment in which size is defined too often in prize money, inaugural award or glittering, headline appearances. Here are the 30-year-old Pakistani Muslim, Indian Hindu Qureshi and Bopanna same age, two of the most outstanding protagonists of the global tennis tour, two avant-garde, swim against the tide of public conventions, sentiments and prejudices in their home countries.

Qureshi and Bopanna to play on the same side of the net in a friendly alliance tennis (and survived the first round on Sunday), is nothing less than a sensation. An even greater sensation than if Federer or Nadal would resign before a possible final next Sunday.

  
"We're just one example of how to live together peacefully," said Qureshi, overcomes a diplomat in short pants, with polished words describing a partnership, "the boundaries and ditches. Just recently got the two world-class doubles player demonstrates involuntary how amazing their own liaison is still - as a fact in India and Pakistan, the two uncanny neighboring nuclear powers, a storm of indignation about the announced marriage of Indian tennis player Sania Mirza and the Pakistan Cricket Stars Shoab Malik broke out. Politicians and populist tabloids zündelten long and hard, but ultimately in vain: The couple dared, against all odds. "We are very happy for the two," said Bopanna.

Sultry Bollywood Fans

On the tennis tour found the almost statesmanlike Qureshi and the teen-stormy Bopanna together easily, without having to shave tight around the political climate and military entanglements: "There are many lonely moments, if you are the whole year on the road in this sport," says Bopanna, "it was nice to be able to converse with someone who understands your language pretty well." Bopanna speaks Hindi, Urdu Qureshi, but it's close together, at least closer than most people who speak those languages.

As Qureshi and Bopanna then agreed to the joint appearance in the doubles, they were initially pragmatic partner, which everyone was happy for himself, "to have found a good neighbor" (Qureshi). But soon they were also friends, "which sparked a wave" (Bopanna), although they are fundamentally different in character. Incidentally, although both are hot-blooded Bollywood fans, but football routes divide: Qureshi is Liverpool-freak, Bopanna fired at Manchester United. "If the play goes against each other, things get to us," said Bopanna.

Qureshi, the only Pakistani in top international tennis, so to speak, is a veteran of the sport Crossing Boundaries: In 2002, the provocateur was sympathetic to the Israeli Amir Hadad in Tour competitions at the start, accompanied by shrill noise in both nations. "Sport is for me free of all conflicts. If there is anything that connects people, then sports, "said Qureshi, an idealist, but living example of his ideals into practice. With his Jewish companions Hadad, he reached in that year at Wimbledon, even the third round, and later they were both from the players' union the ATP Arthur Ashe Humanitarian Award ".

The closer in the late career years, the friendship grew Bopanna, the better was the interaction on the tennis fields: "I understand so well with him that I am blind, what he does - and what not," says Qureshi. The Pakistani is the man who has the good touch, which brings the feints and tricks into the game.Bopanna stands for power, dynamic straightness. "Two players from these two countries, which are complementary just perfect," says the former world number one Mats Wilander (Sweden), "a wonderful thing."

Even big plans

The fact that they both focus almost exclusively on the tennis Affairs for two beats, positively reflected in their job reference: In Johannesburg, they won the season beginning, like their first ATP title, before Roland Garros, they were also in the doubles final in Nice. Advanc Qureshi also became the first Pakistani in doubles in the top 50 of the best rating.

Since his home has a sponsorship agreement with Pepsi and spots with him to run in TV breaks the national sport cricket, he will anyway perceived quite differently: "If the kids only see cricket players in advertising, they think that they only earn money can. And suddenly, I dive on in advertising. "

You do not have big plans for these two unpretentious artists of international understanding. When it comes to them, will soon again on the only road border crossing between Pakistan and India put up a net in Wagah. Then there is a tennis training session to give children from both countries. Qureshi, the Pakistani will be on Indian soil. And Bopanna, the Indians on Pakistani soil. It is still a dream, a vision of the two professionals. But who, if they do not, it could create. "We want to give others the strength to tear down walls in the head," says Qureshi.


NOTE
This is computer translation of the original article in German.

AISAM-UL-HAQ QURESHI - ROHAN BHOPANNA

An unstoppable force now


As one watched Rohan Bopanna and Aisam Qureshi at the US Open on Friday night, one couldn't help but wonder at its timing: Was it ordained by higher and mysterious forces? Was it the divine intervention we have been waiting for?

To begin with, it was the eve of 9/11, the day the world horrifically realized nine years ago that it had become an unsafe place; at the same time, far away from the Flushing Meadows, the ties between India and Pakistan had plummeted to a new low.

Worse, Pakistan has been reeling with the news that its heroes and idols were actually in the grip of bookies and match-fixers; it almost seemed like the country had nothing to look forward to.

And yet, out of the blue, came the silver lining: Rohan and Aisam conjoining to become an unlikely force, the like of which India and Pakistan have probably never seen. As the duo battled the Bryan twins, the two countries ambassadors to UN sat next to each other, rejoicing as long-lost friends; the stands were packed with Indians and Pakistanis, for once echoing the same sentiment too.

In the end, Rohan and Aisam lost the match; but they had won the bigger battle: they had brought the two forever hostile nations together, if only for just one sensational evening. The Bryans choked in the aftermath, even conceding that they would have been happier to lose had it not been a Grand Slam final.

Rohan and Aisam are an unlikely couple though: the former is from the quaint town of Coorg, with surprisingly big ground-strokes; the latter is from bustling Lahore, and is happier volleying. But yes, there is one thing in common: both are quiet and dignified on the court, like true gentlemen. Indeed, they were a welcome relief from the chest-pumping, screaming Tarzans that we see on the circuit nowadays: they went about dismantling Mike and Bob like proud warriors, rather than like desperate street fighters.

They won many big points in the course of the engrossing tussle; they produced quite a few stunning winners too. Yet, they barely clunked fists or let out war cries of delight. They were respectful towards their higher-ranked opponents and mindful of the gravity of the occasion.

It was easy to catch the secret signal one gave to the other before every serve; they shielded their mouths as they exchanged strategies at the start of every game too. It means they were not conversing in Hindi; yet, they did speak the same language at play. 

Their movements were precise and there was clarity and faith in the calling; it was clear that they trusted each other, which can't be said of many Indo-Pak friendships.

For once, nobody tried to be the big brother, which automatically rubbed away any feeling of inferiority: they were equals out there. They came together by chance almost seven years ago, and now, almost suddenly, have been propelled into something that is not in their control anymore. They are not playing for themselves any longer, or for their respective countries even; it has become a much, much bigger game now.

The Indo-Pak Express has of course already been consumed by the propagandists; they have already been handed a cause, a mission too: Stop war, start tennis. It is, no doubt, just the beginning. Their efforts will, however, yield result only if they continue to play as beautifully and as strongly as they did in their first Slam final as one; they need to win titles and, only then, each stroke will bring higher glory to both countries.

Could this confluence be an accident? Was it a coincidence that this year Eid and Ganesh Chaturthi have converged too? Maybe not. Maybe, Aman ki asha is not just a grand dream, after all.

12 September 2010 

Tony Blair - Publish and be damned

How Tony Blair's Journey ended on the page


Tony Blair still has the same pen he used in the Downing Street years — a classy fountain guiding a firm, slanting script. The loops and swirls evident in his lengthy letter as a prospective candidate currying favour with Michael Foot in the early Eighties have disappeared. Blair's self-certainty became first his guiding strength in office — and, finally, his nemesis.

Today, Blair bares all in a £4.6 million memoir that launches the new publishing season. A Journey — downgraded from The Journey after friends advised that it sounded too self-aggrandising — sets the seal on his period in office.
There was never much doubt that the book would go to Random House, the publishing group where chief executiveGail Rebuck raised the subject of a memoir years ago at a dinner with him and her husband, Blair's respected pollster, Philip Gould. There was an “understanding” long before a contract was signed, and her relationship with Blair was one of her strongest cards with Random House's owners, the German publishing giant Bertelsmann. One insider remembers her “producing him quite casually at a dinner for Bertelsmann bosses at her home in Regent's Park”. They were suitably impressed.
It is hoped that despite refusing to do a serialising deal in Britain, the book will “earn out” — ie recap its financial outlay, on US sales. “Blair is a world figure,” says a source at Random House. “This is the nearest thing to the Clinton memoir. You want to share in the story of triumphs and disasters whether or not you're British.”
Early drafts of the manuscript, I'm told, were deemed “informative but a bit stodgy”, and Blair the author is prone to repetitive similes and clichés. He did, however, agree to divulge personal details, including his unhappiness about drinking too much in the evening when the pressures of the job — and Gordon Brown — got too difficult to bear.
To write A Journey, Blair locked himself away at his Foundation HQ at home in Connaught Square with piles of notes, prepared by his loyal staff. Key figures at the Foundation, such as Ruth Turner and press aide Matthew Doyle, have been alongside since the Number 10 days and helped recall key events.
One rival publisher joked last night that parts of the manuscript read as if “written in the airport on an iPad”, and the travails of dealing with a writer who is rarely in the UK soon became apparent at Random House after the coup of securing his memoirs was announced three years ago and the graft began.
Blair confided to an old friend that he needs “at least £5 million a year just to keep the show on the road”, and with lucrative roles as “Middle East envoy”, adviser to a climate-change institute and speech-maker, he made it clear that he would not scale back commitments. A Journey's in-house editor was Caroline Gascoigne — a former Sunday Times literary editor. At one point, a source says, “the manuscript was coming in piecemeal, which made Caroline's job very difficult because everything was out of order”.
But Blair's old friend and former Chief of Staff Jonathan Powell has been a key player. “On the personal stuff, Blair wanted another source of judgment besides Cherie,” said a mutual friend. “Jonathan encouraged him to be frank — not least about Gordon.”
01.09.10